港ディレクトリ
Sprite Plus
仕様
- 船長
- 30" (76.20 cm)
- モータータイプ
- Brushless
- 駆動方式
- Direct
- プロップ
- Single
- 最大アンペア
- 120A
- バッテリータイプ
- LiPo
- バッテリーmAh
- 5Ah (5,000 mAh)
- プロップタイプ
- 2 Blade
- プロップサイズ
- 45mm
- 実行時間
- 30 min
- モデル速度
- 30 km/h (18.6mph)
写真
このボートについて
This Sprite Plus is a lengthened version of the LesRo Sprite that is now 30” long to make it a better boat for use in all weathers, 12 months of the year.
The plans for this lengthened model were drawn up by Chris, who is also planning to build one for himself to use it with an outboard motor - something that looks really good and should be a superb combination.
Meanwhile I am building this as the “prototype” Sprite Plus with a conventional single shaft drive, and I will keep Chris aware of any changes that I make that may be of benefit to him when he builds his own version at a later date.
The main design change (apart from the length) is the front cabin detail that has changed from a flat screen to a “V” shaped double windscreen design.
Chris had drawn this on the plan, but (as is the way with prototypes) I have changed it a little as things tend to “evolve” with prototype builds and my version has been planned to be built right from the start with an integrated cabin construction with access being gained via a “lift-off” cabin top.
Chris prefers to have a complete lift-off superstructure that does give better accessibility, but I prefer to forgo a little accessibility and gain the superior strength and water-proofing that the integrated construction type provides.
My build choice has been ingrained in me ever since I raced my Aerokits Swordsman in an off-shore race in the open sea in the late 1960’s and my friend who had a very similar Swordsman (but with a lift-off cabin) was unable to complete as his complete superstructure was easily “washed-off” by any wave or heavy wake, and even when it was able to stay in place, any “deck-wash” tended to enter the hull as it crept in under where the superstructure sat on the deck.
My friend was a superb craftsman who earned his living as a furniture maker, and so his build quality was far better than anything that I was able to achieve (then or now!), but the construction method could never be as water tight - even with his perfect fit between deck and superstructure.
My build is not yet complete, so I will change the “lead picture” when it is finished, but for now the picture shows the design as it is being built.
Bob,
The plans for this lengthened model were drawn up by Chris, who is also planning to build one for himself to use it with an outboard motor - something that looks really good and should be a superb combination.
Meanwhile I am building this as the “prototype” Sprite Plus with a conventional single shaft drive, and I will keep Chris aware of any changes that I make that may be of benefit to him when he builds his own version at a later date.
The main design change (apart from the length) is the front cabin detail that has changed from a flat screen to a “V” shaped double windscreen design.
Chris had drawn this on the plan, but (as is the way with prototypes) I have changed it a little as things tend to “evolve” with prototype builds and my version has been planned to be built right from the start with an integrated cabin construction with access being gained via a “lift-off” cabin top.
Chris prefers to have a complete lift-off superstructure that does give better accessibility, but I prefer to forgo a little accessibility and gain the superior strength and water-proofing that the integrated construction type provides.
My build choice has been ingrained in me ever since I raced my Aerokits Swordsman in an off-shore race in the open sea in the late 1960’s and my friend who had a very similar Swordsman (but with a lift-off cabin) was unable to complete as his complete superstructure was easily “washed-off” by any wave or heavy wake, and even when it was able to stay in place, any “deck-wash” tended to enter the hull as it crept in under where the superstructure sat on the deck.
My friend was a superb craftsman who earned his living as a furniture maker, and so his build quality was far better than anything that I was able to achieve (then or now!), but the construction method could never be as water tight - even with his perfect fit between deck and superstructure.
My build is not yet complete, so I will change the “lead picture” when it is finished, but for now the picture shows the design as it is being built.
Bob,
がいいねしました
読み込み中…
コメント
サインイン コメントするには。
The moulded rudder sleeve that comes with the usual rudder types (that we mostly all use these days) comes quite long and stands tall, and this usually extends it well above the water line...........but any part of it that is above the keel is unsupported.
Your keel drawings with the integrated rudder support is far superior.
Bob.
I have thought about using a servo on it's side before but the swing of the arm meant that I didn't really gain anything heightwise.
The wing servo I've used on my Fisherman build could be a good alternative in smaller models where the load from the rudder isn't too great, though they are surprisingly powerful.
With all of my builds I ensure that the top of the rudder tube is above the chine/waterline.
I do try to keep the push rod at a similar height between the servo arm and the tiller arm and this probably helps.
The raised rudder mounting support on the Sprite Plus keel does lift the tiller arm higher than I am used to seeing on my other Classic Model Power Boats, but I have cut off the rudder shaft mounting tube at the height of the large brass locking screw to minimise this increased height and it looks good.
I have used this method of mounting a rudder servo for some years and have driven well over 100 hours of fast cruising without incident or failure.
Rudder movement is not adversely affected by mounting the servo this way.
The advantage of mounting the servo this way is that it is very simple and locates the position of the servo VERY positively with no movement of the servo on the mountings, and it can be very helpful when fitting a servo under a low floor where the lower profile can be accommodated more easily.
Removing or changing the servo is also very fast as the two mounting screws are very easy to access, and when removed the servo just lifts out of the hull.
I will picture the linkage when I fit it and have checked that the raised tiller arm height has not caused any problems between the servo and tiller arm connection.
Bob.
Morning Will,
The idea has worked well since I first used it on Rapier 1, and that model has clocked-up over 100 hours of fast cruising and the servo has remained firmly in place.
Although a very simple way of mounting the servo, it is also very effective and allows a rapid servo removal if/when required.
The blocks are cut slightly lower than the height of the servo, so when the ply skin top cover plate is screwed on it is under some tension to add pressure onto the servo to help keep it in place.
Bob.
Easily removable too, nice 😉👌
Will
A retaining top cap was cut from ply skin to keep the servo in place.
I have used the above servo mounting system on my previous builds including Rapier 1, Kopy Kommander and Remora.
Bob.
The idea is that the lower pointed central joint will overlap the rear section of the three part roof to lock it down - leaving only the front part needing some sort of locking device - maybe a magnet?
I started with a regular shape screen, but it looked wrong on a boat with a square punt nose and so I changed to a shape with more angular "shoulders" that I think will look better.
Early days...........
Bob.
Hopefully they will all still fit OK when the clamps and brass tacks are removed.
Once the glue is set, I can sand the edges to shape and decide if I am going to design a suitable cockpit windscreen, or maybe even a small shaped wind deflector would look good?
A bit of cardboard engineering will be required as I draw and cut out some shapes to see what looks good........or leave it as the original Sprite, with no additions in this area?
Bob.